Only 54% of security pros have a written policy on length and randomness for keys for machine identities
Machines also need to authenticate themselves to each other so they can communicate securely, relying on cryptographic keys and digital certificates, which serve as machine identities. To better understand the gap between implementation of security controls for human identities and those for machine identities, Venafi evaluated responses from over 1,500 IT security professionals from the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, and Australia across a range of company sizes and industries. Just half (54%) of organizations have a written policy on length and randomness for keys for machine identities, but 85% have a policy that governs password length for human identities. Organizations will spend over $10 billion protecting human identities this year, but they are just getting started with machine identity protection. “Machine identities are a relatively new, and very effective, point of attack, but there is a huge gap between the security controls applied to human identities and those applied to machine identities.
Comments
Post a Comment